Re: SRDF and oracle

On Sep 18, 8:57 pm, DA Morgan <damor..._at_psoug.org> wrote:

snip

> A different answer from what?

Read the freaking post again. Figure it out. Look at the items cited.

>
> I just finished teaching a Data Guard class two hours ago.
>
> Some of the students were from a little unimportant company named
> Boeing. Also in attendance people from an unimportant little company
> named Nintendo. And still another from a little unimportant company
> named Deutche Telecom. I was aided in putting the curriculum together
> by a DBA from an unimportant company named Amazon.com. Last month saw
> implementation by one of the largest French corporations in the US.
> And in a few weeks we will be helping a publicly traded energy and
> natural resource firm in the midwest.

What does this have to do with your claim that all the oracle customers are ditching EMC as a storage vendor?

> I won't pretend to speak for either Oracle or its VP's, Townsend and
> Kyte, but I suspect their experience is no different from mine.

Well it looks like you contradicted yourself all within one sentence. Nice.

 Data
> Guard is mainstream and used by a significant percentage of Oracle's
> Enterprise customers. It works no matter the operating system or
> storage vendor.

Where did I say that Dataguard is not mainstream or doesn't work most of the time?

 And Oracle support will stand behind the implementation.
> That can not be said for EMC or any other storage vendor.

Go back to the post. Oracle terminated the hardware compatibility program. Got it? Received on Wed Sep 19 2007 - 07:02:13 CDT