Re: Cache Hit Ratio from system views

"Richard Foote" <richard.foote_at_nospam.bigpond.com> wrote in message news:sObEi.32252$4A1.30226_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Shakespeare" <whatsin_at_xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:46e01761$0$233$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
>>
>> "Frank van Bortel" <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com> schreef in bericht
>> news:fb9los$vcd$2_at_news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Die, thread, die!
>>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
>>>
>>> iD8DBQFG2FpdLw8L4IAs830RAnJeAJwMZ+B2IvJcPQvWE+Kinz2JkeBRPgCghe3M
>>> vJwbGx/7MgIkGGRj0qgcnMs=
>>> =OA0Z
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> or just continue at
>>
>> http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/hit-ratios-2/
>>
>> but read that one first.
>>
>> Shakespeare
>
> Nicely written article. As usual, Jonathan explains things so much better
> than I could.
>

Hmmm, the same thing does look more credible on a nicely formatted page, even from someone who said almost nothing on this thread. By randomly picking a few sentences from my comments, it does show he has other interests in mind.

> Sadly, Bob will of course read this as further confirmation on how totally
> wrong he is regarding all this and will yet again vainly attempt to
> deflect his embarrassment by claiming that Jonathan hasn't read the thread
> properly and that all Jonathan's points are not related to the topic at
> hand.
>

You are wrong again. I said YOU did not read the thread. I guess I was right about that.

> Poor Bob has yet to learn that a redundant metric is really really useful
> because, ummm ummmm because it just is, is not the most convincing of
> technical arguments !!
>

Poor Dick, he still can't make any sense. Perhaps he is unconscious. Received on Sun Sep 16 2007 - 17:29:28 CDT