Re: Dataguarad Real Time Apply

On Aug 29, 11:19 pm, joel garry <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:

> I don't have any access to either a system or the ug's papers just
> now, but the vague memory is enough to make me say something here,
> perhaps someone else can say if it is correct or not. I do remember
> thinking at the time, "boy, that's just like the RFS problem I had in
> 8i, except they seem to have maybe better configuration and error
> handling of it now."
>
> Feel free to pull the start cord on the chainsaw.

I guess you are referring to the delayed commits that LGWR synchronous archival may introduce. Since real-time apply makes use of this archival method, then in a way, yes, there is an overhead with realtime  apply that Hikaru should be aware of. But this overhead is not directly caused by real-time apply since LGWR synchronous archival can be used with standard apply and delayed apply as well. Received on Thu Aug 30 2007 - 03:22:50 CDT