Re: expdp question

<sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl> wrote in message
news:5ggic3hkgetan6q0c9kd2ni1kmrj4bnlrb_at_4ax.com...
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:24:17 -0500, "Bob Jones" <email_at_me.not> wrote:
>
>>
>>"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message
>>news:1187293670.685320_at_bubbleator.drizzle.com...
>>> Bob Jones wrote:
>>>> "Brian Peasland" <dba_at_nospam.peasland.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:46c3189c$0$16271$88260bb3_at_free.teranews.com...
>>>>> Chuck wrote:
>>>>>> We're finally getting around to installing 10g and I had a question
>>>>>> about expdp. We used to write our exports to named pipes so they
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> be compressed with gzip. Data pump doesn't support that. Is there
>>>>>> *any*
>>>>>> way around that limitation or do I need to continue using
>>>>>> export/import
>>>>>> if I want compressed files?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TIA
>>>>> Upgrade to 11g? It does allow for compression of data pump dump files.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Brian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Burn down the house to kill a bug?
>>>
>>> Assuming your employer is legally licensed the upgrade is free. There
>>> is a huge amount of value in 11g. Of course if you don't want to best
>>> technology there is always Ingres or Pick.
>>
>>You have to be nuts to advise people to upgrade to 11g now.
>>
>
> Quoting from one of your previous posts
>
> "I would suggest you to go fuck yourself."
>

Don't just quote me. Do it now. Received on Mon Aug 20 2007 - 21:29:55 CDT