Re: continuation...

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:01:00 -0700
Message-ID: <1185037260.199614@bubbleator.drizzle.com>

Bob Jones wrote:

>>> This is no sarcasm, if everything you say here is true. It has none to do 
>>> with morality, unless you think not upgrading to the lastest Oracle as 
>>> being immoral.
>> Mark and Willie may, and Larry likely does, but I could care less just
>> so long as you comply with both the spirit and the letter of the law.
>>

>
> Hmmm, I never know they are the standard of morality. So is it the law or
> morality? You can't seem to make up your mind.

Are you being intentionally obtuse or are you really as incapable of following a straight line as it appears?

The law is the law. Product capabilities make compliance possible.

The dog wags the tail ... not the other way around.

Come back with another transformation of this simple logic and I'll killfile the thread.

> Which new feature in the latest version I can't do without? That has been
> the question all along.

No it hasn't. You've never once asked that question. So:

RTFM. Go to OTN and look up "compliance."

I don't like to waste time on people who are intentionally sarcastic and antagonistic.

>> Oracle is putting these features into the product so that they can sell
>> a product that makes compliance possible. If the there was not a
>> compelling reason to buy those features, and they were put in anyway, I
>> doubt Safra would look kindly upon those who spent their time and money
>> unwisely.

>
> Name one.

Audit Vault

YOYO!

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

Received on Sat Jul 21 2007 - 12:01:00 CDT