On May 27, 1:27 am, sybra..._at_hccnet.nl wrote:
> On 26 May 2007 15:13:40 -0700, zigzag..._at_yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >Oracle has rather convoluted (which are vvery inefficent) ways of
> >calling C++ or Java from PL/SQL, so it is best not to call these
> >languages from PL/SQL at all.For xeample, if you wnat to call Java
> >from PL/SQL, you always have to develop PL/SQL wrappre function and
> >there are various retsrictions on the type pf Java method you can call
> >(it has to be made static public). So Oracle will tell you you can
> >call Java or C++, but in pratice it is limited and in efficent.
>
> Again a post full of nonsense, and without any benchmark to demonstate
> so-called 'inefficiency'.
> The 'wrappre' function is exactly one line, so stating this is a
> problem is just utter nonsense.
> Stating it is best not to call these languages from PL/SQL because of
> non-proven inefficiency is an example of promoting nonsensical
> development practices.
> If calling Java from PL/SQL is inefficient this is because Java is an
> interpreted language. Apparently you are unaware of this fact.
> I would recommend you com back when you actually know what you are
> talking about.
>
> --
> Sybrand Bakker
> YOu contuSenior Oracle DBA
You contine to demonstrate that you do not know have any
understanding of C++ and Java. So in addition to being arrogant (as
always) you are ingnorant as well. I will not respond to any of your
responses in this thread,
Received on Sun May 27 2007 - 04:18:36 CDT
