On May 20, 5:06 am, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor..._at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> zigzag..._at_yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > If you know Java or C++, you are better of using them than using PL/
> > SQL. Computers run so fast that performance advantages gained by PL/
> > SQL over C++ or Java are very little. On the other hand, if you do not
>
> Never heard more BS than that
>
> - --
> Regards,
> Frank van Bortel
>
> Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFGUA+ALw8L4IAs830RAtdxAJ9tx3Tw9Fqj/ezIaBLhWfrpqF/6vgCbBQEK
> VDfwZV5T6HSQtWOpY8oyDOE=
> =EV8q
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Why do you thinh JDBC, PRO C/C++ , Csharp .NET etc are developed in
the first place. Does PL/SQL have all the object-orieneted features of
JAVA or C++? It all depends on which background one comes from and
what are the career path one wants to take? Learning many langauges
is always a good think. One should not limit oneself to PL/SQL. Usings
statements like rubbish just shows one lacks objectivity and.
Received on Sun May 20 2007 - 07:51:46 CDT
