Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 10g fash_recovery_area

Re: 10g fash_recovery_area

From: JW <jw_at_abc.com>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 04:02:22 GMT
Message-ID: <4lkq331s2tt5u9g4e1dc5c3ppuo3ur4k4t@4ax.com>


Thanks for your quick reply.
Do you mean that I can configure the Archive Log to flash_recovery_area, and RMAN to different disk/folder ? I thought they have to be the same area. Sorry to ask that simple question.
JW

On Sat, 05 May 2007 17:02:24 -0700, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote:

>JW wrote:
>> I worked on Oracle 9i for a while under Window 2000 environment. I
>> just started working on 10g, and work like to clarify a confusion.
>>
>> In Oracle 9i, it was recommanded that the Archive Log folder (disk)
>> should be doifferent from the folder (disk) for storing the RMAN
>> files. But in 10g, it looks like they are to be kept in
>> flash_recovery_area. Is this contradict what it should be defined
>> before ?
>>
>> Also there is maximum size definition of the flash_recovery_area.
>> Should I defined the total size of the expected archived logs plus the
>> RMAN files ? Or should I just defined the disk size for the folder ?
>>
>> Thanks for clarifying for me.
>>
>> JW
>
>What you are looking as is the default installation if you do no
>customization during installation. Not a best practice for scalability
>and performance.
>
>The rule has never changed ... spread everything for maximum spindles.
Received on Sat May 05 2007 - 23:02:22 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US