On May 1, 12:01 pm, "fitzjarr..._at_cox.net" <fitzjarr..._at_cox.net> wrote:
> On May 1, 10:28 am, Tao <gordon.t..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sorry mother.
> > So out of 5 ways, the 4th one might apply in my case. What makes you
> > think I have no right to ask for ppl's opinion if there is a easier
> > way that I didn't see? That offended you so much didn't it.
>
> > On May 1, 11:10 am, "Michel Cadot" <micadot{at}altern{dot}org> wrote:
>
> > > "Tao" <gordon.t..._at_gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news: 1178031718.880006.168..._at_h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> > > Micel,
>
> > > I believe I've mentioned that I'm still using Oracle 9.2 so 10g's
> > > "collect" function is of no use to me.
> > > Yes I understand any string manipulation can be done using PL/SQL
> > > functions, thanks.
>
> > > ---------------------------------
>
> > > "collect" is just the last explained way, there 4 others available in 9.2
> > > and one does not use PL/SQL.
>
> > > Regards
> > > Michel Cadot- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> What makes you think Michel, or anyone here, thinks that? Are your
> sensibilities so fragile that any comment, no matter the nature, is an
> attack on you? The response you received from Michel provided the
> requested information, and did so with a bit of humour. It is a
> shame you can't recognize good natured wordplay when it is presented
> to you.
>
> David Fitzjarrell
Because the word he was using "is" harsh?
Maybe Tao over-looked an solution. But what these forums are for?
That that gives Michel and you the right to bash him?
Received on Thu May 03 2007 - 11:33:11 CDT
