On Mar 28, 10:21 am, Robert Klemme <shortcut..._at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this question is going to sound a bit fuzzy as I cannot disclose
> a lot of detail. However my intention is to get a rather general
> statement about your experience. My question is basically: is anybody
> here aware of higher overhead in Ora 10g disk IO vs., say 8.1.7? One
> thing that came to mind are all the management features; I know that
> they are using functionality that has been available for several
> versions but maybe more of these introspecting features are enabled by
> default.
>
> Thanks for any feedback!
>
> Kind regards
>
> robert
Hi Robert,
i've little experience with 8.1.7, but with 9.2. we have our
application running both on 9.2 and 10.1
and 10.2. I've not seen appreciable differences in disk I/O. moreover
i i think taht management options
do not put any overhead on disk i/o, may be a little on CPU, but it is
nothing to bother with.
Received on Wed Mar 28 2007 - 03:36:59 CDT
