On Mar 15, 12:11 am, "fitzjarr..._at_cox.net" <fitzjarr..._at_cox.net>
wrote:
> On Mar 13, 7:33 pm, "Iano" <ianmcclem..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 14, 8:46 am, "joel garry" <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 13, 1:06 pm, sybra..._at_gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > On 13 Mar 2007 12:20:02 -0700, "Valentin Minzatu"
>
> > > > <valentinminz..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > >Is this 8i? I highly doubt there are any [quarterly] updates available
> > > > >for it.
>
> > > > Quarterly *security* patches are available for 8.1.7.*4*
>
> > > LOTD: "* The Error Correction Support for 8.1.7 on this platform
> > > ended on 31-DEC-2003 as described in Oracle Database 8.1.7 (8i)
> > > desupport notice 1 of 2 Note 250629.1. The patch 3811838 for this
> > > platform was uploaded to MetaLink by mistake. " - metalink Note:
> > > 281189.1, security alert #68
>
> > > jg
> > > --
> > > @home.com is bogus
>
> > I was thinking about this the other day ... if the Data Dict update
> > scripts are run on the Primary, are these changes then transferred to
> > the standby, so all that needs to be done is to patch the binaries on
> > the standby server. ?!?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Funny, I said that 5 hours prior to your realization.
>
Sorry, I read your post as meaning that the Standby DB would have to
be recreated from the primary (source)
But are you saying that step 3 in your post is not required (not being
sarcastic, just a bit confused now)
Received on Wed Mar 14 2007 - 16:58:22 CDT
