Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: LDAP.ora
HansF schreef:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:14:53 +0100, Frank van Bortel wrote:
>
>> HansF schreef: >>> Has anyone run into an issue using one centralized OiD for TNS resolution, >>> and a completely separate OiD for SSO? Any impact or concern? >>> >> Fail to see when ONAMES comes in - that was phased >> out when 8 or 8i was phased out. Doesn't harm, tho, >> but I'd rather have LDAP, TNSNAMES, EZNAME - in that >> sequence for your case.
Hmmm - did TNSNAMES to LDAP (using the Network tools, that is done in a jiffy), never ONAMES to LDAP. Surely there's a conversion/upgrade tool? But still, LDAP, ONAMES, TNS would be the sequence of my choice; if LDAP fails, try the good old ONAMES, and only then revert to the file based TNS stuff.
BTW: if the tnsnames file is still around, it should be maintained - converting tnsnames.ora to LDAP entries is something well documented, and working! If tns is still maintained -and thus up2date- maybe that is an alternative?
>> About your question: have not used your scenario, but >> would not be surprised to find a product, or >> installation, or combination, that does >> not support this scenario of two LDAP servers. >> I'd stick to one - if load is a problem, balance. But >> somehow I doubt that load is the issue at hand here...
-- Regards, Frank van Bortel Top-posting is one way to shut me up...Received on Sun Feb 18 2007 - 04:20:50 CST