Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: LDAP.ora

Re: LDAP.ora

From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:14:53 +0100
Message-ID: <er6v2o$qre$1@news6.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>


HansF schreef:
> Ran into this today ... (default App Sserver 10.1.2.0.2 install on
> Win2003)
>
> I configured the sqlnet.ora to look at LDAP first, then tnsnames, onames
> and host. Then I set up the ldap.ora in the ORACLE_HOME/network/admin to
> use a custom port (not the default 389)
>
> It didn't find the LDAP entry, although the entry was clearly uses from
> another machine.
>
> Searching, I found ORACLE_HOME/ldap/admin/ldap.ora with default port 389
> settings. Changed that port and all works as expected.
>
> Turns out this is documented. In the database Networking Reference manual
> http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/network.102/b14213/ldap.htm#sthref969
> Of course, the tool used by the app server OUI is well documented ...
>
>
> Question:
>
> Has anyone run into an issue using one centralized OiD for TNS resolution,
> and a completely separate OiD for SSO? Any impact or concern?
>
>

Fail to see when ONAMES comes in - that was phased out when 8 or 8i was phased out. Doesn't harm, tho, but I'd rather have LDAP, TNSNAMES, EZNAME - in that sequence for your case.

About your question: have not used your scenario, but would not be surprised to find a product, or installation, or combination, that does
not support this scenario of two LDAP servers. I'd stick to one - if load is a problem, balance. But somehow I doubt that load is the issue at hand here...

-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel

Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
Received on Sat Feb 17 2007 - 07:14:53 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US