Re: Windows vs Linux Performance

From: <mccmx_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 22 Jan 2007 13:43:02 -0800
Message-ID: <1169502182.792608.126530@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

> The biggest issue I have seen with RAC on Windows they didn't even test.
> The point of RAC is not how much water can I push through the pipe. The
> point of RAC is FAILOVER.
>
> My experience with Windows and failover is that what happens with Linux,
> subsecond, can take up to 25 seconds with Windows which is not acceptable.

Fair point but the whole point of the document was to compare performance of Windows vs Linux, not failover.

I would lke to have seen the comparison done without the added complexity of RAC involved.

Matt Received on Mon Jan 22 2007 - 15:43:02 CST