Re: apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.

From: Ana C. Dent <anacedent_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:43:30 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns98B06D1A3362anacedenthotmailcom@69.28.173.184>

"hpuxrac" <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:1168043609.010907.167620_at_38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

>
> K. Nielsen wrote:

>> "K. Nielsen" <nahdsl232734_at_nahvip.cybercity.dk> wrote in message
>> news:459ebae4$0$184$157c6196_at_dreader1.cybercity.dk...
>> >
>> > "Anurag Varma" <avoracle_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:1168014584.067524.85040_at_s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > aman.oracle.dba wrote:
>> >> Michel Cadot wrote:
>> >> > "aman.oracle.dba" <aman.oracle.dba_at_gmail.com> a écrit dans le
>> >> > mess

> age

>> >> > de news:
>> >> > 1167974188.705052.140810_at_s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> >> > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
>> >> > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2
>> >> > | then 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or
>> >> > | can I do it directly. on windows XP
>> >> > |
>> >> >
>> >> > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
>> >> > Please read it before posting.
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards
>> >> > Michel Cadot
>> >> Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to
>> >> upgrade it to 9.2.0.4
>> >
>> > I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all
>> > problems! 
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Anurag
>> >
>>
>> Sorry this may  seem as if it came from Anurag which is not the case.

>
> Do you have anything useful to contribute to the question from the OP?
>

POT<==>KETTLE<==>BLACK Received on Sat Jan 06 2007 - 12:43:30 CST