Re: non-AQ messaging question

From: jared <jared_at_hwai.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:46:53 -0500
Message-ID: <Km3ih.2129$4R1.477@newsfe12.lga>

Niall Litchfield wrote:
> jared wrote:

>> Andy Hassall wrote:
>>> On 13 Dec 2006 12:08:19 -0800, "jared" <jared_at_hwai.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> (before anyone asks "Why not use AQ?", it is because we are doing this
>>>> with Standard Edition servers)
>>>  SE supports AQ though, in all currently supported versions...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andy Hassall :: andy@andyh.co.uk :: http://www.andyh.co.uk
>>> http://www.andyhsoftware.co.uk/space :: disk and FTP usage analysis tool
>> Not according to DocID 271886.1.  I really, really hope I am wrong; it
>> would solve many problems.
>>

> Perhaps you should read the note to which you refer :)
>
> Database Features :
> =================
>
> Advanced Queuing Y Y Y Y Provides direct support in
> the database for high
> performance queuing and
> messaging operations,
> integrated with LDAP.
>

But not Streams. In other words, it sounds like explicit capture only.

    Ah well, I suppose that is why we have keyboards. Received on Tue Dec 19 2006 - 22:46:53 CST