Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Key Compression vs. Selectivity

Re: Key Compression vs. Selectivity

From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:13:19 +0100
Message-ID: <4uflcnF186664U1@mid.individual.net>


On 15.12.2006 13:15, Jonathan Lewis wrote:
> "Robert Klemme" <shortcutter_at_googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:4uf9uoF17a65cU1_at_mid.individual.net...
[...]
> Richard,
>
> The "most selective first" has always been a little
> flexible (at least since 6.0 appeared)

Yeah, in the case I am pondering there is a TIMESTAMP column as first column because queries typically cover only a certain time range. It's probably not the most selective column though.

 > and your
> basic reasoning is correct.
>
> A couple of references you might want to look at:
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/ch_07.html
> (see the item on index compression)
> and
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/compress_ind.html

Thank you, James! ;-)

SCNR         robert Received on Fri Dec 15 2006 - 07:13:19 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US