Re: Delete of child-entry locks father-table

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:37:07 -0800
Message-ID: <1165423014.448784@bubbleator.drizzle.com>

EscVector wrote:

> DA Morgan wrote:

>> Matthias Hoys wrote:

>>> "Michael Austin" <maustin_at_firstdbasource.com> wrote in message
>>> news:n9Jch.7045$wc5.722_at_newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>>>> HerbertMue wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Primarily we are using Oracle 9.2.0.1.
>>>>> And this problem occurrence at Oracle 9i.
>>>>> But we are also using 8.1.7 (there I have not tested this feature so
>>>>> far)
>>>>>
>>>> You do realize that you are running years-old software.  Oracle dropped
>>>> support for both of these versions years ago and will desupport ALL of 9i
>>>> come Jul-2007. Upgrade to something more current.  It still boggles my
>>>> mind how you can run your business on stuff this old - I guess you and
>>>> your management care very little for your data.
>>>>
>>>> From Metalink:
>>>> Support Status
>>>>     For details of 9.2.0 desupport dates see the Lifetime Support Policy
>>>>     Note that Premier Support for 9.2 ends July 2007
>>>>     9.2.0.8 Current (terminal) 9.2 Patch Set
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Austin.
>>>> Database Consultant
>>> True.
>>> I work in Belgium, and you would be amazed how many Oracle 8i instances are
>>> still running out there :-) Probably some 7.3.4's too ! Upgrading to recent
>>> versions only costs money is the general idea behind it I think.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matthias

>> I would be here were it not for the little thing called "the law."

>>

>> The cost of not complying with Sarbanes-Oxley, FACTA, etc. is far higher
>> than the cost of upgrading. And, at least in the US, the accounting
>> firms have often refused to sign off on a financial statement unless
>> proof of auditability and compliance were in verified.

>>

>> Doesn't Basel II affect Belgium?
>> --
>> Daniel A. Morgan
>> University of Washington
>> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
>> (replace x with u to respond)
>> Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
>> www.psoug.org

> 
> Isn't Basel II for Banks?  Either way, if the company isn't public, it
> can choose to ignore these requirements.  Banks, of course, are also
> regulated by many other rules as well.

If your statement, above, refers to US law it is incorrect. There are many auditing requirements that have nothing to do with an organization being public.

FACTA, for example, applies to a hot dog stand.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

Received on Wed Dec 06 2006 - 10:37:07 CST