Re: Delete of child-entry locks father-table

From: hpuxrac <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: 5 Dec 2006 12:25:40 -0800
Message-ID: <1165350340.634176.79120@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>

DA Morgan wrote:
> Matthias Hoys wrote:
> > "Michael Austin" <maustin_at_firstdbasource.com> wrote in message
> > news:n9Jch.7045$wc5.722_at_newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> >> HerbertMue wrote:
> >>
> >>> Primarily we are using Oracle 9.2.0.1.
> >>> And this problem occurrence at Oracle 9i.
> >>> But we are also using 8.1.7 (there I have not tested this feature so
> >>> far)
> >>>
> >> You do realize that you are running years-old software. Oracle dropped
> >> support for both of these versions years ago and will desupport ALL of 9i
> >> come Jul-2007. Upgrade to something more current. It still boggles my
> >> mind how you can run your business on stuff this old - I guess you and
> >> your management care very little for your data.
> >>
> >> From Metalink:
> >> Support Status
> >> For details of 9.2.0 desupport dates see the Lifetime Support Policy
> >> Note that Premier Support for 9.2 ends July 2007
> >> 9.2.0.8 Current (terminal) 9.2 Patch Set
> >>
> >> --
> >> Michael Austin.
> >> Database Consultant
> >
> > True.
> > I work in Belgium, and you would be amazed how many Oracle 8i instances are
> > still running out there :-) Probably some 7.3.4's too ! Upgrading to recent
> > versions only costs money is the general idea behind it I think.
> >
> >
> > Matthias

>

> I would be here were it not for the little thing called "the law."

>

> The cost of not complying with Sarbanes-Oxley, FACTA, etc. is far higher
> than the cost of upgrading. And, at least in the US, the accounting
> firms have often refused to sign off on a financial statement unless
> proof of auditability and compliance were in verified.
>
> Doesn't Basel II affect Belgium?

Why are you attempting to hijack this thread. Your content is not remotely related to the OP.

If you want to start a new topic please do so. Received on Tue Dec 05 2006 - 14:25:40 CST