Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: The need to 'get around' the 4000 character limit in varchar2
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> hpuxrac wrote on 12.11.2006 00:57:
> > Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> >> hpuxrac wrote on 11.11.2006 01:47:
> >>>>> Tx!
> >>>> Move it to a CLOB.
> >>> You are missing the other previous relevant answers and exchanges in
> >>> this thead.
> >> > Wonder how many people already suggested that one.
> >>
> >> Because moving to CLOB is the only sensible solution.
> >
> > I wonder what my first suggestion was in this thread.
> >
> > Why don't you read it from the beginning?
>
>
Thomas I originally noted that "if the OP cannot use BLOB or CLOB" THEN ... blah blah blah.
Sorry if this confused you but perhaps I should have stated it more explicitly. Obviously using a BLOB/CLOB appears to be the best or at least most clean solution.
That's going to require application changes and testing etc, just as any application originally written against SQL server and migrated to oracle will require ( at least testing ) and perhaps/probably some amount of application changes.
Potentially putting on a bandaid with multiple varchar2 columns would be ugly and a scalability concern but perhaps using this approach with a view and a public synonym might be be more transparent, not that this is necessarily a good thing.
Tom Kyte has this whole area ( designing an application to take advantage of the features provided by a database vendor versus database independence ) covered quite well in several of his books as well as his ask tom site. Received on Sun Nov 12 2006 - 09:48:34 CST