Re: serializable isolation level behavior question

From: Bob Jones <email_at_me.not>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:16:58 GMT
Message-ID: <eCs_g.18884$6S3.16674@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>

<xhoster_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:20061020214827.032$NU_at_newsreader.com...
> DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote:
>>
>> I have to confess I too am shaking my head in amazement.
>>
>> Hopefully not betraying my ignorance but my understanding is the same as
>> yours. I can't understand why anyone would use DDL and expect it to
>> behave transactionally.
>
> The person who wanted the transactionality is not the person who issued
> the
> DDL. A *different* person issued the DDL.
>

Yes. DDLs do not write to rollback, therefore no before image for the person performing DML. Received on Sat Oct 21 2006 - 12:16:58 CDT