Re: Row in USER_INDEXES table not deleted when constraint is dropped

From: HansF <Fuzzy.Greybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:01:13 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2006.10.08.19.01.12.467778@gmail.com>

On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 11:28:55 -0700, DA Morgan wrote:

>
> I found that. Then I started trying to decode 0x01 through 0x2000
> and didn't come up with 4097. I'll look again.

Well ... 0x1000 is 4096, not 4097 <g>

-- 
Hans Forbrich   (mailto: Fuzzy.GreyBeard_at_gmail.com)   
*** Feel free to correct me when I'm wrong!
*** Top posting [replies] guarantees I won't respond.

Received on Sun Oct 08 2006 - 14:01:13 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: tony_at_aberdour.demon.co.uk: "Checking that I can restore from RMAN backups (if I need to)"
Previous message: Brian Peasland: "Re: Flashback and UNDO_RETENTION"
In reply to: DA Morgan: "Re: Row in USER_INDEXES table not deleted when constraint is dropped"
Next in thread: capnwhit_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Row in USER_INDEXES table not deleted when constraint is dropped"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US