Re: How long is long enough for primary key ?

From: David Portas <REMOVE_BEFORE_REPLYING_dportas_at_acm.org>
Date: 7 Oct 2006 02:49:06 -0700
Message-ID: <1160214545.996291.236280@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>

DA Morgan wrote:
>
> Second Normal Form
> tables do not have composite primary keys
>

I realize that your definitions are only informal but this one is a total mistake. 2NF does not imply the absence of composite keys.

-- 
David Portas

Received on Sat Oct 07 2006 - 04:49:06 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jagjeet Singh: "Undo Tablespace growing even with retention = 0"
Previous message: Jagjeet Singh: "Undo Tablespace growing even with retention = 0"
In reply to: DA Morgan: "Re: How long is long enough for primary key ?"
Next in thread: DA Morgan: "Re: How long is long enough for primary key ?"
Reply: DA Morgan: "Re: How long is long enough for primary key ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US