Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Automatic Shared Memory Management needs Diagnostics Pack license?

Re: Automatic Shared Memory Management needs Diagnostics Pack license?

From: hpuxrac <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: 5 Oct 2006 04:10:52 -0700
Message-ID: <1160046652.692113.115610@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Mark Townsend wrote:
> That would be me. The contribution was the Oracle Database Licensing
> Information - see
> http://www.oracle.com/pls/db102/to_toc?pathname=license.102%2Fb14199%2Ftoc.htm
>
> It should pretty much answer any questions you have. You may not always
> like the answers however.

So what happens in the case where someone is running standard edition?

Do they even have the ability to navigate thru the GUI to the "Management Pack Access" and remove and apply access even though standard edition people cannot purchase those options packs?

Part of what you have included seems to me at least to be more marketing boilerplate than helpful technical information. For instance "Oracle Database Standard Edition One delivers unprecedented ease of use, power, and performance for workgroup, department-level, and Web applications. From single-server environments for small business to highly distributed branch environments, Oracle Database Standard Edition One includes all the facilities necessary to build business-critical applications."

Ok well how about the "ease of use"? How does one get that ease of use if oracle does not supply ways to access critical oracle system information?

It includes "all the facilities to build business-critical applications?" ... as long as you don't need to monitor or make changes to them once they are operational?

I was under the impression that what you were going to research with your customers was if oracle had made some bad design ( or pricing ) decisions in terms of the types of monitoring 10g does, the access and control of that monitoring thru the GUI, etc.

>From looking at the document you produced it to me at least appears as
if you have accepted and tried to put a pretty face on all the current limitations and restrictions without regards to impact, useability, and the ability of administrators/developers to do their jobs?

Or are there other things you are working on that are not included in this document? Received on Thu Oct 05 2006 - 06:10:52 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US