Re: 10g RAC and SRDF

DA Morgan wrote:
> I'd recommend not trying to layer one failover solution on top of
> another. What is it you think you will get from HACMP you won't get
> from RAC and Data Guard?
>
> The entire point of RAC is low-cost commodity hardware. Not the most
> expensive solution IBM has to offer. If you can consider a failure
> that would cause you to want to mirror the Oracle binaries ... why
> would you care? Let the node crash and burn. That's the whole point of
> the technology.

The OP noted SRDF. That's EMC technology not IBM not that you may know the difference.

It's often typical with SRDF and disaster recovery techniques to mirror volumes.

The OP is not talking about concerns with individual nodes crashing and burning. Get with the program. Received on Wed Sep 27 2006 - 14:24:35 CDT