Re: Oracle released ( finally ) 10.2 on solaris 10 x86 ( 32 bit )

From: Bob Jones <email_at_me.not>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:51:15 GMT
Message-ID: <7mlQg.3155$vJ2.1216@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>

"Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message news:fse0h2ttig5fakibg7flrtddcvhk09jp2d_at_4ax.com...
> On 19 Sep 2006 11:08:20 -0700, "Vladimir M. Zakharychev"
> <vladimir.zakharychev_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Personally, I would go with Solaris - Linux won't be anywhere near in
>>features, stability and scalability for the next few years even with
>>all effort put into it, by which time Solaris will move even
>>further.And there are so many flavours of Linux, supporting them all is
>>simply impossible even though they may all be based on the same kernel
>>(and Oracle doesn't, they support but 3 different distributions
>>afaik...) But Larry strongly supports Linux, at least in interviews, so
>>who knows...
>
> Finally someone who has something sensible to say about Linux, and
> doesn't subscribe to the Linux hype.
> Personally I think there are so many flavours, that there is no such
> thing as 'Linux'.
>

There are so many flavors of UNIX, does that mean there is no such thing as 'UNIX'. Received on Wed Sep 20 2006 - 19:51:15 CDT