Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Performance

Re: Performance

From: Sybrand Bakker <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:52:02 +0200
Message-ID: <5bsog21uuf09qakaf7lj8u0m4opikclvul@4ax.com>


On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:22:48 GMT, "Bob Jones" <email_at_me.not> wrote:

>
>"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message
>news:1158434012.841819_at_bubbleator.drizzle.com...
>> Bob Jones wrote:
>>> "DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message
>>> news:1158381746.337032_at_bubbleator.drizzle.com...
>>>> Bob Jones wrote:
>>>>>> And, IIRC, Solaris 5.8 doesn't have asynchronous I/O on default ufs
>>>>>> file systems.
>>>>> The chance is that you remembered incorrectly.
>>>> Solaris has added asynchronous I/O capabilities to different parts of
>>>> the kernel at different times. For example, asynchronous I/O for sockets
>>>> wasn't added until Update 4. It may well be that different people are
>>>> referring to differences within Solaris 8 and all are correct.
>>>
>>> But this is not about sockets, this is about ufs.
>>
>> That wasn't the point of what I wrote.
>
>Then you point was irrelevant to the point in question.
>

This happens to be an unmoderated newsgroup. You seem to act like a moderator, better still a newsgroup bully Could you either stop doing that, or put your offensive behavior on display somewhere else?
Thank you!

--
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Sat Sep 16 2006 - 16:52:02 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US