Re: Oracle 9.2.0.x Patches - Cnfused

hpuxrac wrote:
> dbaplusplus_at_hotmail.com wrote:
> >
> > I had already done that. All REDAME files lead to metalink. For example
> > 9.2.0.7 patchset for Windows 32 platform, it refers to a metalink note
> > 189908.1 (which I already had in my original mail). What I have been
> > trying to point out that patches described in a link on this note are
> > quite different than Windows platform only release notes (211268.1).
> > That is very confusing and I am assuming that patches described in note
> > 211260.1 are the ones implemented, but I still do not know whether
> > patchset 9.2.0.7 includes Patch set 6 exceptions are not. I may have
> > to contact Oracle support.
>
> Somehow somewhere you are just not understanding or not trying very
> hard.
>
> The documentation that accompanies the 9.2.0.7 says what bugs it fixed.
> Some of those bugs are probably ones not fixed in the 9.2.0.6 original
> patchset but fixed eventually via one off's from the 9.2.0.6 base
> patchset.
>
> Keep trying and you will figure it out eventually.
>
> On the other hand, probably 9.2.0.8 is now out ( it was just released
> this week I believe for most platforms ) and 9.2.0.8 "probably" fixes
> anything missing that 9.2.0.7 did not have.
>
> Of course 9.2.0.8 may introduce some other problems.
>
> C'est la vie.

actaully, I did not see any of 9.2.0.6 one-off bugs fixed (there are probaly 50+ of them) in 9.2.0.7. That is the reason, I created this thread. Received on Fri Aug 25 2006 - 19:11:02 CDT