Re: Oracle 9.2.0.x Patches - Cnfused

Matthias Hoys wrote:
> <dbaplusplus_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1156508028.799719.84880_at_75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com wrote:
> >> hpuxrac schreef:
> >>
> >>
> >> > If the one off patch that you are interested in for 9.2.0.6 came out
> >> > after 9.2.0.7 was rolling then no probably 9.2.0.7 doesn't include it
> >> > but a one off for 9.2.0.7 may exist.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Which can be found in the release notes, were all bugs fixed in the
> >> patch release are named
> >
> > Where are the relase notes? On metalink there are references to various
> > notes. When I look at those notes, I do not see these patches
> > documented, that's why I started this thread.
> >
> > For example there is release note for 9.2.0.7 (189908.1).
> > , it has generic bugs fxied and platform speific (windows platform, hp
> > unix etc0. This list is quite diffreent from the note which describes
> > Windows platform only release notes (211268.1). Wjat I am I missning/
> >

>

>

I had already done that. All REDAME files lead to metalink. For example 9.2.0.7 patchset for Windows 32 platform, it refers to a metalink note 189908.1 (which I already had in my original mail). What I have been trying to point out that patches described in a link on this note are quite different than Windows platform only release notes (211268.1). That is very confusing and I am assuming that patches described in note 211260.1 are the ones implemented, but I still do not know whether patchset 9.2.0.7 includes Patch set 6 exceptions are not. I may have to contact Oracle support. Received on Fri Aug 25 2006 - 16:24:10 CDT