Re: ora-1450 even though max key length is well below the max

From: Maxim Demenko <mdemenko_at_arcor.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:27:12 +0200
Message-ID: <449ab842$0$4513$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>

Anurag Varma schrieb:

> That said, 3118 limit seems to be for a 4K block size. Are you sure
> that your block size is 8K?
>

>
> Anurag
>

I have just verified it on a 9.2.0.6 / Linux and got 3218 ( not 3118 ) for 8k blocksize , on 10.2.0.1 / Linux /8k blocksize - same results as yours (i.e. 6398) , in the Note Chuck mentioned there are limits for 8i which correspond to mine. It seems, the limit is version/plattform dependent.

Best regards

Maxim Received on Thu Jun 22 2006 - 10:27:12 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Maxim Demenko: "Re: ora-1450 even though max key length is well below the max"
Previous message: Chuck: "Re: ora-1450 even though max key length is well below the max"
In reply to: Anurag Varma: "Re: ora-1450 even though max key length is well below the max"
Next in thread: Anurag Varma: "Re: ora-1450 even though max key length is well below the max"
Reply: Anurag Varma: "Re: ora-1450 even though max key length is well below the max"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US