DA Morgan wrote:
> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>> On 2006-06-20, Chuck <skilover_nospam_at_bluebottle.com> wrote:
>>> DA Morgan wrote:
>>>> Here are some of the more obvious advantages.
>>>> 4. Incremental scalability
>>> Is the scalability any closer to linear than it was with OPS in 8i or is
>>> there still a fairly low point of diminishing returns?
>>
>> RAC is MUCH better.
>>
>> In many cases, RAC scales better than NUMA.
>>
>> Oracle re-engineered the part of OPS that sucked so badly.
>
> Oracle's published RAC scaling number is 84%. That is roughly what
> I have seen in my lab too: Usually a bit better.
So if scalability were your main concern, what benefit is there to RAC
over say, adding more CPU's to the server?
Received on Wed Jun 21 2006 - 14:03:30 CDT
