Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RAC and DataWarehouse

Re: RAC and DataWarehouse

From: JEDIDIAH <jedi_at_nomad.mishnet>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:11:40 -0500
Message-ID: <sl0om3-1h5.ln1@nomad.mishnet>


On 2006-06-20, Chuck <skilover_nospam_at_bluebottle.com> wrote:
> DA Morgan wrote:
>>
>> Here are some of the more obvious advantages.
>
>> 4. Incremental scalability
>
> Is the scalability any closer to linear than it was with OPS in 8i or is
> there still a fairly low point of diminishing returns?

        RAC is MUCH better.

        In many cases, RAC scales better than NUMA.

        Oracle re-engineered the part of OPS that sucked so badly.

-- 
	Apple: because TRANS.TBL is an mp3 file. It really is!      |||
								   / | \

 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------        
                http://www.usenet.com
Received on Wed Jun 21 2006 - 09:11:40 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US