Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: oracle on sun solaris

Re: oracle on sun solaris

From: Connor McDonald <connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:02:43 +0800
Message-ID: <4492BA03.525C@yahoo.com>


Bob Jones wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm an fan of raw - not just because it gives the best performance
> > (since you can the same with file systems if done properly), but it
> > instils a lovely discipline with datafile management.
> >
>
> I think it is more harsh than lovely.
>
> > You'll still need a file system for archive logs anyway - a decent CFS
> > makes handling failover and RAC easier to look after
>
> Why is this only the case for failover or RAC?
>
> > Connor McDonald
> > Co-author: "Mastering Oracle PL/SQL - Practical Solutions"
> > Co-author: "Oracle Insight - Tales of the OakTable"

Because for things like recovery, a node may need access to an archive log that it did not write...so a CFS can assist.

-- 
Connor McDonald
Co-author: "Mastering Oracle PL/SQL - Practical Solutions"
Co-author: "Oracle Insight - Tales of the OakTable"

web: http://www.oracledba.co.uk
web: http://www.oaktable.net
email: connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com


"Semper in excremento, sole profundum qui variat."

------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Jun 16 2006 - 09:02:43 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US