Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> active / active servers with databases - pros and cons

active / active servers with databases - pros and cons

From: Thiko! <biwombi_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 9 Jun 2006 08:54:14 -0700
Message-ID: <1149868454.920209.248130@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>


hi

BACKGROUND



I have a production environment for a service running oracle on a sun server and this has a backup server in standby mode using oracle 10g dataguad. This standby server can also be used for read only reporting at the same time.

MOVING FORWARD



I have a development, test and training environment consisting of separate database instances on a separate machine.

I'm trying to work out the pro's and con's of having the production / standby environment in an active/active set up and moving the dev/test/training database onto the standby server as well. At failover time the dev/test/training environment would failover onto the old primary.

PROS


  1. cost - less servers to manage and buy / have support for
  2. more manageable - one server to manage

CONS


  1. possibility of developers accidentally connecting to the production environment
  2. cant tune the production environment 100% for the live app as server will have to be tuned for the other dev/test/training instances as well e.g. with memory allocation etc.
  3. at failover time old primary server may be unavailable for dev/test/training to failover onto - production performance could be affected with the dev/test/training use. developers experience performance probs, cant do what they want to then ask why dev/test/training doesn't have its own environment/server.

Question



Does anyone have any experience of this and can they recommend some pro's and con's?

Many thanks.

Thiko! Received on Fri Jun 09 2006 - 10:54:14 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US