Re: Oracle slowed down

From: ianal Vista <ianal_vista_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:57:02 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns97ADDF572C421ianalvistahotmailcom@70.169.32.36>

"Bob Jones" <email_at_me.not> wrote in
news:MDC2g.4833$Lm5.3542_at_newssvr12.news.prodigy.com:

>
> "ianal Vista" <ianal_vista_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97ADCC0C1C044ianalvistahotmailcom_at_70.169.32.36...

>> "Bob Jones" <email_at_me.not> wrote in news:xJB2g.68772$H71.2665
>> @newssvr13.news.prodigy.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "HansF" <News.Hans_at_telus.net> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2006.04.22.23.38.08.809156_at_telus.net...
>>>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:25:28 +0000, Bob Jones wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, it does not. BCHR is neither deprecated nor irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>> Do you accept that BCHR can occasionally be an indication of
>>>> application and code issues rather than buffer size issues?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> How do you quantify differentiations between the two situations?

>
> By looking at both and tune them separately.
>
>

Based upon which quantifiable metrics?

You keep speaking in vague generalities. How do you expect anyone to substaniate your claims without reproducible metrics that you have consistentantly failed to provide? Facts are only facts if other can obtain the same results you claim to exist. Received on Sat Apr 22 2006 - 23:57:02 CDT