Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!

Re: Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!

From: Bob Jones <email_at_me.not>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 03:34:02 GMT
Message-ID: <KAC2g.4831$Lm5.2557@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>

<xg_at_oraclexg.com> wrote in message
news:1145515759.282256.260060_at_u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> http://codebetter.com/blogs/sahil.malik/archive/2004/08/28/23563.aspx
> wrote:
>
> Allright, so I installed Oracle personal edition on my desktop. Here
> are my peeves against oracle -
>
> a) First of all, the installation was in 3 cd's equivalent - so much
> for microsoft being bloatware.
> b) When my PC boots up, I have Oracle's process taking up 96 MB of
> memory compared to SQL Server's under 10MB, the memory usage keeps
> going up exponentially as I use either product.
> c) Here's my biggest problem - when I wanted to uninstall Oracle, it
> isn't in add/remove programs like all other friendly citizens of the
> computer world, instead it has it's own crappy java based installer,
> and instead of uninstall they prefer to call it "Deinstall", and
> what's worse in the treeview it shows me, when I check an item to be
> unistalled, the zillions of items under it, are still unchecked - are
> they going to be uninstalled or will they be not? It takes a minimum of
> 3-4 hours to individually check everything there is.
> d) When the frickin' "de"-installation is complete, the installer
> remains on the system. But it's group dissappears from my start menu or
> add/remove programs or everywhere. Is there spyware in that?
> e) Talk about all the JUNK that Oracle installed in the first place,
> look at your registry before and after Oracle got done trading the soul
> of your poor PC, it adds many megabytes of information to the registry
> .. what in the world !!!!
>
> Larry Ellison IMHO has only one business idea - "Defeat bill gates
> and trap every programmer in matrix like pods powering oracle
> databases". WHAT THE HECK !! Time he matured up a bit.
>

Yup, Oracle may have gotten too carried away with the Java stuff. They are using it where ever possible. JVM is a problematic, memory robbing, slow beast we all have to put up with.

> SQL Server, especially Yukon is a MUCH better dbms in my opinion, the
> only reason Oracle will continue to survive is
>
> a) Anti-Microsoft Zealots and Bigots .. and ..
> b) The huge installed base of Oracle (It isn't easy porting your DBMS
> from Oracle to SQL Server).
>
>

Also because it runs on many platforms and has more advanced features. Received on Sat Apr 22 2006 - 22:34:02 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US