Re: Oracle slowed down

From: Bob Jones <email_at_me.not>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:55:45 GMT
Message-ID: <5oz2g.13722$4L1.13455@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>

"ianal Vista" <ianal_vista_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns97ADAA1CDFD1Dianalvistahotmailcom_at_70.169.32.36...
> "Bob Jones" <email_at_me.not> wrote in news:IXy2g.13714$4L1.12286
> @newssvr11.news.prodigy.com:
>
>>
>> "HansF" <News.Hans_at_telus.net> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2006.04.22.22.14.55.540761_at_telus.net...
>>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:56:20 +0000, Bob Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>> The only thing I disagree with here is that BCHR is deprecated or
>>>> irrelevant.
>>>
>>> Not deprecated does not imply relevant.
>>>
>>
>> No, it does not. BCHR is neither deprecated nor irrelevant.
>>
>>
>
> Since the BCHR can be achieved at what ever value that is desired,
> how is BCHR relevant & to who?

To people who make distinction between application tuning and buffer cache tuning. Received on Sat Apr 22 2006 - 18:55:45 CDT