Re: Oracle slowed down

From: ianal Vista <ianal_vista_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:43:06 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns97ADAA1CDFD1Dianalvistahotmailcom@70.169.32.36>

"Bob Jones" <email_at_me.not> wrote in news:IXy2g.13714$4L1.12286 @newssvr11.news.prodigy.com:

>
> "HansF" <News.Hans_at_telus.net> wrote in message
> news:pan.2006.04.22.22.14.55.540761_at_telus.net...

>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:56:20 +0000, Bob Jones wrote:
>>
>>> The only thing I disagree with here is that BCHR is deprecated or
>>> irrelevant.
>>
>> Not deprecated does not imply relevant.
>>

>
> No, it does not. BCHR is neither deprecated nor irrelevant.
>
>

Since the BCHR can be achieved at what ever value that is desired, how is BCHR relevant & to who? Received on Sat Apr 22 2006 - 18:43:06 CDT