Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec

From: HansF <News.Hans_at_telus.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:52:47 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2006.02.17.01.52.47.630351@telus.net>

On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:50:43 +0000, HansF wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:48:08 -0800, Noons wrote:
> 

>> Tony Rogerson wrote:

>>> The later is the transaction versioning that Oracle offers; the former just
>>> gives the last committed value and doesn't block the writer; both can be in
>>> force if necessary.
>>>
>>> --

>>
>>
>> "both can be in force is necessary"?
>>
>> BOTH??????
>> That tells me all I needed to know about how
>> well it was implemented. As usual, no one
>> has a CLUE what it's for so "let's just allow both"
>> in case anyone asks...

> 
> Now, now, Noons, don't blow a gasket.  
> 

Sorry - I missed the tags ... ;-)

<heavy sarcasm>
  You know very well it was implemented with Microsoft's traditional   impeccable foresight and precision - performing flawlessly for the cadre   of developers who will make appropriate use of the capabilities after   having studied them, and their impacts, very carefully.  

  And the resulting data will be used by upper management of many companies   to make critical business decisions.
</heavy sarcasm>

-- 
Hans Forbrich                           
Canada-wide Oracle training and consulting
mailto: Fuzzy.GreyBeard_at_gmail.com   
*** Top posting [replies] guarantees I won't respond. ***

Received on Thu Feb 16 2006 - 19:52:47 CST