Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec
Hi Murthi
Thanks for the response. People not top posting drive me nuts. I have
followed a thread and want to sea the latest response not piles of pointy
brackets. Who dreamed up this so-called etiquette anyway?
Peter McMurray
"murthi" <c_xyz_murthi_at_seeing_xyz_green.net> wrote in message
news:a47Hf.21$Hn.19_at_trndny05...
> Well, then , Frank, I guess you won't reply to this one, eh?
>
> No I don't use a decent new reader myself and I would appreciate it if all
> WOULD top post. Many's the time I don't bother to read something because
its
> too frigging long way down.
>
> So thanks, Tony, for making it easy to read...
>
> Chandru Murthi
>
> "Frank van Bortel" <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dsimqj$1tp$1_at_news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> > Tony Rogerson wrote:
> >> Right then Joel, lets have a go then.
> >>
> >> Whats your argument?
> >>
> >> Even on a build your own box costing around £500 can deliver over
> >> 50MBytes /
> >> second write and read speeds using Windows Server.
> >>
> >> Go for the 64 bit version and you can get quite a few GBytes of memory,
> >> most
> >> entry level boards <£100 take 4GB of DDR.
> >>
> >
> > Don't top post - can I suggest you use a decent news reader?
> > As you see, your ugly format/utility cuts off the rest of the thread.
> >
> > Point is: a decent Linux will deliver better throughput on the *same*
> > hardware. Changed 'twice the' into 'better'. Can't substantiate twice,
> > can better.
> >
> > And personally, I'd love to see you stop promoting non-oracle stuff
> > here. It's annoying; most people here hate Microsoft anyway.
> > Just a little further, and you're spamming.
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Frank van Bortel
> >
> > Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 10 2006 - 16:40:48 CST