Mladen Gogala wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:10:41 +0000, Niall Litchfield wrote:
>
>
>>Mike wrote:
>>
>>>The database link is public and without username and password. It is
>>>for sox compliance.
>>>
>>
>>That seems an interesting approach to SOX compliance. Allow anyone who
>>gains access to db A automatic access to db B? Is that really what is
>>desired?
>
>
> Niall, now you're nitpicking. Enron wasn't sunk by a DBA. SoX was designed
> to sell hardware and software, not to make sense.
Au contraire. SoX was designed to reassure investors to keep investing
in companies so the markets wouldn't be sunk by a DBA.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Received on Wed Jan 11 2006 - 17:43:06 CST
