Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: SAN versus NAS versus direct attached storage

Re: SAN versus NAS versus direct attached storage

From: <goyald_at_gmail.com>
Date: 18 Dec 2005 09:31:14 -0800
Message-ID: <1134927073.943331.311750@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> 





Andrew


I agree with some of the comments. I was looking for some concrete data
that I can use to backup these conclusions. BTW, I have few comments..
1. Micrsoft does support NAS subject to certain conditions.  Please
check http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=304261



I think Network Appliance's device was only one certified till now..



2. I always thought that multi-port SCSI drive will allow me to create
a database cluster without using a SAN. AM I not correct?




Thanks
Received on Sun Dec 18 2005 - 11:31:14 CST












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US