Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: row vs row.column level locking

Re: row vs row.column level locking

From: <xhoster_at_gmail.com>
Date: 16 Dec 2005 17:23:13 GMT
Message-ID: <20051216122313.359$Hl@newsreader.com>


Mladen Gogala <gogala_at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 23:09:28 +0000, NetComrade wrote:
>
> > on column level RDBMS will need to track more changes on a sub-row
> > level (e.g. the way UNDO and oracle blocks are architected might have
> > to change).
>
> So, essentially you feel that somebody ought to change name on my bank
> account, while I'm making deposit? Me thinks not.

But it is OK if they change the name on your account when you are not making a deposit? Hmmm. You do have a positive balance, right? I think I'll volunteer for this experiment.

Xho

-- 
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB
Received on Fri Dec 16 2005 - 11:23:13 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US