Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Selects via DB Links - Special Tuning Considerations

Re: Selects via DB Links - Special Tuning Considerations

From: Bob Jones <email_at_me.not>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:09:38 GMT
Message-ID: <mK2kf.22956$D13.11571@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>

"Steven Kondolf" <skondolf_at_nospam.rochester.rr.com> wrote in message news:ek61p11tplu1ghrt7srtmum7hodrp1pf55_at_4ax.com...
> We have an old 8.0.6.3 database running on HPUX 11 that currently
> contains our Oracle Applications 11.0.3 instance (both database and
> APPL_TOP) as well as a data warehouse schema. We are beginning to run
> out of physical room and plan on moving the data whse schema over to a
> Linux server running 10g (10.2.0.1) and Redhat AS 4.0. This will also
> free up processing resources on the old HP box.
>
> As we cannot upgrade our 11.0.3/HP box until next year due to business
> reasons (read MONEY), our 8.0.6 box will still contain the
> jobs/reports/scripts etc. Our plan is to build a db link from the
> 8.0.6 box to the 10.2 box and change our code to perform our
> processing via this db link.
>
> Are there any special tuning considerations relative to db links,
> sqlnet, etc. that I should be looking at? I've found notes on
> Metalink commenting on tuning sqlnet by setting the SDU and TDU sizes
> but I've also found notes that state this would be of limited value
> and the "default settings" are adequate in the vast majority of
> situations.
>
> I don't have a lot of Oracle8 documentation available and am currently
> having trouble connecting to tahiti.oracle.com to see if there's any
> docs for 8 there. Thanks for any help or insights given.
>
> Steve

You might run into problems since version 8 is no longer supported. Depending on your applications, this change could generate a lot of network traffic, and make your queries run slower.

Oracle docs are all over the internet, not just on tahiti. Received on Fri Dec 02 2005 - 15:09:38 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US