Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: informix market share

Re: informix market share

From: Serge Rielau <srielau_at_ca.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:22:07 -0500
Message-ID: <3v68ukF13ggl4U1@individual.net>


HansF wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:52:32 -0500, Serge Rielau wrote:
>
>

>>*chuckle*And there always will be because SMP scales better than RAC 
>>(more CPUs needed) and RAC is cited as a major contributer to Linux 
>>licenses... it ain't free. To quote the Oracle ad's fineprint freely 
>>"DBMS software and switches not included ..." ;-)

>
>
> Pot <-> Kettle? From the IBM site, when I looked at DB2 under Linux <g>
>
> https://www-112.ibm.com/software/howtobuy/buyingtools/paexpress/Express?P0=E1&part_number=D518GLL,D518JLL,D53Y2LL,D56CILL&catalogLocale=en_CA&Locale=en_US&country=CAN&PT=html&S_TACT=none&S_CMP=none
>

Nope, not Pot <-> Kettle. IBM isn't actively hunting down SMP boxes to turn hardware $ into software $. Also IBM is not running that SMP vs "cheap linux cluster" add. I find it funny how a software company can run an add on price and then exclude the very product they are selling from the pricing. That is quite creative.

Cheers
Serge

-- 
Serge Rielau
DB2 SQL Compiler Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Received on Wed Nov 30 2005 - 12:22:07 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US