Madison Pruet wrote:
> "DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message
> news:1133128547.820245_at_yasure...
>
>>Madison Pruet wrote:
>>
>>>"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message
>>>news:1133072683.547964_at_yasure...
>>>
>>>
>>>>xiaoxin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>The list price of IDS is about 20% more than oracle EE. No one is
>>>>>more expensive than oracle, when it comes to database.
>>>>
>>>>But wouldn't a more accurate comparison of IDS to Oracle be with
>>>>Oracle's Standard Edition?
>>>
>>>
>>>Not really. IDS has both HDR and Enterprise Replication as a base part
>
> of
>
>>>the product. Last time I checked, the Oracle equivalent of IDS/ER would
>
> be
>
>>>streams replication, not Oracle standard replication. And the last time
>
> I
>
>>>checked Standard Edition didn't include Streams Replication.
>>
>>But there is a lot more to Oracle EE than just Steams. My question was
>>... 'did anyone do an actual feature comparison to see which was the
>>most appropriate?'. I see little that would convince me IDS is not a
>>closer match to Oracle's Standard Edition.
>>
>>Does anyone have a feature-by-feature comparison that would indicate
>>otherwise?
>
>
> If Oracle EE could 1) run on more than 4 CPUs, 2) included DataGuard (IDS
> HDR), 3) included Streams Replication (IDS ER), ... - then it would be fair
> to say that IDS should be compared to Oracle EE.
>
>
>
>
>
>>--
>>Daniel A. Morgan
>>http://www.psoug.org
>>damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
>>(replace x with u to respond)
I think you meant SE. EE runs on an unlimited number of processors and
includes Streams and DataGuard.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Received on Sun Nov 27 2005 - 16:31:53 CST
