Re: Overcoming objections to Oracle

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-downwithspammersfamily_at_attbi.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:45:23 -0800
Message-ID: <GpOdnQ3uqZ5CGB_enZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com>

"Serge Rielau" <srielau_at_ca.ibm.com> wrote in message news:3udsbeF10r61gU1_at_individual.net...
> DA Morgan wrote:
> > D Baldwin wrote:
> >
> >> " I can't think of a single bank ... not BofA, not
> >> Washington Mutual, etc. that is not an Oracle shop."
> >>
> >> Wells Fargo is also an Oracle shop, a friend of mine just went to work
> >> for
> >> them.
> >>
> >> Dana Baldwin
> >> Intel DBA
> >
> >
> > I'd personally be surprised to find any bank in the US that
> > wasn't. Doesn't mean they aren't out there. But that would
> > not stop me from being surprised.
> Sidenote: Most, if not all, major companies have some of everything. A
> function of mergers and acquisitions if not dual vendor company policy.
> E.g. Wells Fargo is also a "DB2 for LUW shop".
>
> To stick with the topic though, from the little interaction I have,
> those who like "multi valued" like it a lot (a bit like beer preference
;-).
<snip for brevity>

Is multi-valued less filling?
Jim Received on Mon Nov 21 2005 - 20:45:23 CST