Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Is this a bug in 9i ( FK question )

Re: Is this a bug in 9i ( FK question )

From: Mark C. Stock <mcstockX_at_Xenquery>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:07:44 -0500
Message-ID: <eL-dnVI2KZXZkODenZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@comcast.com>

"Mark C. Stock" <mcstockX_at_Xenquery .com> wrote in message news:k8CdnW8lL49yluDeRVn-uQ_at_comcast.com...
>
> "Rob Williamson" <robw_at_physics.umd.edu> wrote in message
> news:437D08B7.ADB49EA2_at_physics.umd.edu...
>
>> SQL> @fktest
>> FORIEGN KEY (item)
>> *
>> ERROR at line 3:
>> ORA-01735: invalid ALTER TABLE option
>
> ...
>
>>
>> Here are some of the other Alter tables that actually worked:
>>
>> ALTER TABLE cost_history
>> ADD CONSTRAINT cost_history_fk_inventory
>> FOREIGN KEY (item_number)
>> REFERENCES inventory ;
>>
>
> FOREIGN vs FORIEGN
>
> Sometimes error messages tell the truth -- I hate when that happens! ;-)
>
> Suggestions:
> -- Don't top post
> -- Do ignore flames
>
> ++ mcs
>

with apologies to David Fitzgerald ...

After taking a look at David's 'arrogant' response, and Rob's reaction to it, I need to change those suggestions to:

(again, David, sorry I impugned you before checking what Rob was referring to)

++ mcs Received on Thu Nov 17 2005 - 17:07:44 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US