Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle Innobase Purchase Impacts MySQL.

Re: Oracle Innobase Purchase Impacts MySQL.

From: Paul <paul_at_see.my.sig.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:38:19 +0100
Message-ID: <8h9vk11lq3vl6ionar1mmer4kfj815hbsq@4ax.com>

DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote:

> > Interbase has used MVCC (Multi Generational Architecture,
> > record-versioning, record-shadowing - whatever you want to call it)
> > for years and didn't steal it. Apparently, according to Jim Starkey
> > the creator of Interbase, he invented MVCC.

> A complete read of the article ... including links ... shows that Oracle
> had it in version 3: Likely preceding InterBase's predecessor. But my
> comments were not about "who had it first" rather on who might be
> holding key technology patents today.

Couldn't it be like, say, QuickSort? Nobody has to get permission to do a QuickSort. Would one need to be worried about patents if one were to implement a database with a locking mechanism?

Paul...

-- 

plinehan __at__ yahoo __dot__ __com__

XP Pro, SP 2, 

Oracle, 9.2.0.1.0 (Enterprise Ed.)
Interbase 6.0.1.0;

When asking database related questions, please give other posters 
some clues, like operating system, version of db being used and DDL.
The exact text and/or number of error messages is useful (!= "it didn't work!").
Thanks.
 
Furthermore, as a courtesy to those who spend 
time analysing and attempting to help, please 
do not top post.
Received on Fri Oct 14 2005 - 07:38:19 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US