Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-12!sn-xit-09!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: DA Morgan <damorgan@psoug.org>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: CBO influences
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:45:04 -0700
Organization: Ye 'Ol Disorganized NNTPCache groupie
Message-ID: <1126799052.142560@yasure>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1126283179.991124.138480@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>   <1126284892.947680.217710@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1126294364.813025.287860@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <dfsonr$5g9$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com> <1126306293.634107@yasure> <dftp0r$621$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com> <1126329859.958172@yasure> <dftu3v$82a$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com> <1126374364.66827@yasure> <dfvg2j$no3$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com> <43282C72.36FC@yahoo.com> <dg9dve$5em$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com> <43297223.D8E@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <43297223.D8E@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cache-Post-Path: yasure!unknown@oracle.advtechserv.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 46
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:251613

Connor McDonald wrote:

>>Don't share a SAN if you want to run a high
>>performance OLTP system - they're not very
>>good for small, highly randomised I/Os.
>>
>>--
>>Regards
>>
>>Jonathan Lewis
>>
>>http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/cbo_book/ind_book.html
>>Cost Based Oracle - Volume 1: Fundamentals
>>On-shelf date: Nov 2005
>>
>>http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
>>The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
>>
>>http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/appearances.html
>>Public Appearances - schedule updated 4th Sept 2005
> 
> 
> I would generalise to SAN's are not good at IO... period
> 
> :-)

That has not been my experience.

What I have found is that often storage admins say to the DBA:
"You asked for 60 gigs ... I gave you 60 gigs" and put it all
on one 400GB disk or one LUN.

Properly configured the story changes dramatically.

Kent Stroker, formerly Oracle's SE of the year (two years in a
row) and an expert on RAC and storage has many times during his
public lectures stated that the one of the biggest tuning problem
facing most installations he sees is improperly presented disks.
There is no operating system or Oracle instrumentation capable
of telling you that the storage admin made bad decisions. So often
we end up tuning, as best we can, given what we got.
-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan@x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
